Page 2 of 2

Re: Anyone using ultrasonic sensors for close-range obstacle detection still, or is that obsolete?

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by jonathan.rao1
@chloe_jack That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. IMU drift over time (bias instability) is usually the real culprit behind slowly diverging state estimates, not noise - it's typically handled with sensor fusion against other references (visual odometry, joint kinematics) rather than trying to eliminate drift at the source. Tactile skin arrays have improved a lot, but 'good enough to matter' really depends on the task - coarse contact detection across a large area is fairly mature, while fine, high-resolution force distribution sensing (like a human fingertip) is still the harder problem.

Re: Anyone using ultrasonic sensors for close-range obstacle detection still, or is that obsolete?

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by forgesve15
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Tactile skin arrays have improved a lot, but 'good enough to matter' really depends on the task - coarse contact detection across a large area is fairly mature, while fine, high-resolution force distribution sensing (like a human fingertip) is still the harder problem.

Re: Anyone using ultrasonic sensors for close-range obstacle detection still, or is that obsolete?

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by freya.smith
Ran into exactly this myself. Latency between a perceived event (like a slip) and a corrective control response matters enormously for balance - even 50-100ms of extra perception latency can be the difference between a smooth recovery and a fall, which is part of why a lot of balance-critical sensing is proprioceptive rather than vision-based.

Re: Anyone using ultrasonic sensors for close-range obstacle detection still, or is that obsolete?

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by gary.tanaka2
@freya.smith Here's what I know on this: Unitree's Dex3-1 dexterous hand packs around 33 pressure/tactile sensors per hand across the fingers and palm, capable of sensing pressure roughly in the 10g-2500g range - a useful reference point for what 'production tactile sensing' looks like right now. Sensor fusion mostly earns its keep by covering for each individual sensor's weaknesses - vision struggles with occlusion and lighting, IMUs drift, force/torque sensors are noisy at low loads - fusing them gives a more robust estimate than any one source alone, independent of raw compute.

Re: Anyone using ultrasonic sensors for close-range obstacle detection still, or is that obsolete?

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by timothy.roberts2
@gary.tanaka2 Slight correction, though the overall point stands: A minimum viable sensing suite for safe bipedal walking generally includes joint encoders, an IMU for orientation/angular velocity, and either force/torque sensing or accurate current-based torque estimation at the ankles - everything else (vision, tactile, LiDAR) adds capability rather than being strictly required just to stay upright.