Page 2 of 3
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2026 11:54 pm
by pierregreen
@elarsen69 Agreed, and I'd add:
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2026 9:00 pm
by ananya.novak
Agreed, and I'd add:
Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2026 7:08 am
by ethan_fisc
I can speak to this a bit.
Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2026 4:48 am
by rivera14
@ethan_fisc This matches what I've seen too.
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2026 7:17 am
by chloe.harris7
@rivera14 Can I ask a dumb follow-up -
In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by scott21
Genuinely curious -
Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by novak49
@scott21 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly.
Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by james15
Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by gary.tanaka2
@james15 Side note that might be relevant:
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve.
Re: Anyone tackling in-hand reorientation (regrasping without putting the object down)?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by jchen
@gary.tanaka2 I can speak to this a bit.
Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked.