Page 2 of 3
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2025 1:07 am
by benjaminsanchez
@sarah.santos3 Just to be precise about one thing:
Battery placement (torso-centered vs backpack vs distributed through the limbs) is a real tradeoff between center-of-mass/balance considerations and thermal/cooling access - a torso-centered pack helps balance but is harder to cool than a more exposed backpack placement.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2025 10:57 pm
by kim37
@benjaminsanchez Just to be precise about one thing:
There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2025 12:21 pm
by giulia.roberts4
This raises a question for me -
Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2025 3:59 pm
by scott21
@giulia.roberts4 +1 to this. Worth adding:
A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2025 7:28 pm
by jhansen
@scott21 Pretty much this. One thing to add:
Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime. Idle/standing power draw is often surprisingly close to a meaningful fraction of active walking power draw once you account for onboard compute, sensors, and balance-holding torque - 'doing nothing' still costs real energy on a humanoid.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2025 1:21 am
by charlesbianchi
To answer this directly:
Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2025 12:50 am
by hill23
Here's what I know on this:
Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2025 12:32 am
by ethan_fisc
Sorry if this is a basic question, but
Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2025 4:01 pm
by kwilliams
@ethan_fisc One nitpick -
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Idle/standing power draw is often surprisingly close to a meaningful fraction of active walking power draw once you account for onboard compute, sensors, and balance-holding torque - 'doing nothing' still costs real energy on a humanoid.
Re: How do you budget thermal margin when actuators are packed that densely?
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2025 11:11 pm
by carol38
I dealt with almost this exact situation.
DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too. Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs.