Page 2 of 2
Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?
Posted: Sun May 31, 2026 10:08 am
by kim37
I'd frame this differently.
Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2026 6:35 am
by nicole10
I'd frame this differently.
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free. A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2026 8:16 pm
by matthew43
@nicole10 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well.
Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2026 3:17 pm
by amandawhite
Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2026 3:04 am
by larrysokolov
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong -
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Distributed power architectures (multiple smaller packs or local capacitor buffering near high-draw actuators) can reduce peak current demands on the main bus and improve fault isolation, at the cost of added complexity versus a single central pack.