Page 2 of 4
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:25 pm
by sarah.santos3
Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2025 7:24 am
by dubois35
@sarah.santos3 That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2025 11:48 am
by barbara50
@dubois35 Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2025 4:16 pm
by williams84
@barbara50 I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 9:20 am
by young56
This lines up with my experience.
Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2025 8:06 pm
by choi98
@young56 I can speak to this a bit.
Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2025 1:57 am
by rossi30
@choi98 Ran into exactly this myself.
Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2025 10:15 am
by byang
@rossi30 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly.
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2025 9:09 am
by green28
Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
Re: What's actually different about Apollo vs Optimus vs Digit at the hardware level?
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2025 2:32 am
by ashley_flor
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.