Page 2 of 2
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2026 9:28 pm
by ethan_fisc
New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious -
The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2026 3:32 pm
by jonathan.rao1
This lines up with my experience.
Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2026 6:38 am
by servobre20
@jonathan.rao1 From hands-on experience,
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station. The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2026 12:54 am
by aliu
@servobre20 +1 to this. Worth adding:
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by jonathan_tana
That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
Joining an existing robotics community (FRC, university clubs, maker spaces) before going fully solo is a common and effective way to pick up practical fabrication and control skills faster than working entirely alone from tutorials. Starting in simulation (even a simplified physics sim of just the leg or the target gait) before touching real hardware is one of the more reliable ways to avoid destroying expensive parts while debugging balance and walking control from scratch.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by greta.carter
Just to be precise about one thing:
UC Berkeley's Berkeley Humanoid Lite is a genuinely open-source, roughly $5,000, 3D-printable humanoid - structural parts print on a standard desktop printer (around a 200x200x200mm build volume), with CAD files, parts lists, assembly instructions, and control code all published for hobbyists to replicate.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by priya85
Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits. Starting in simulation (even a simplified physics sim of just the leg or the target gait) before touching real hardware is one of the more reliable ways to avoid destroying expensive parts while debugging balance and walking control from scratch.
Re: Anyone built a humanoid torso only (no legs) as a first project? Worth it?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by vyoung
Here's what I know on this:
A realistic hobbyist bill-of-materials for a small biped balloons fast once you add a real IMU, decent motor controllers, a reasonable battery/BMS setup, and enough compute for onboard control - the headline '$5k' budget assumes a fair amount of DIY fabrication rather than buying finished modules. Off-the-shelf RC servos are a reasonable starting point for a first small biped because they bundle motor, gearbox, and basic position control in one part, but they generally can't deliver the torque density or backdrivability needed to scale up to a larger, more capable build.