Page 2 of 3

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2026 4:44 pm
by george92
I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Fri May 01, 2026 3:30 am
by aliu
Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Sat May 02, 2026 10:29 am
by ethan_fisc
@aliu Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. The common academic path into this field is a master's or conversion course in robotics or machine learning, followed by an internship or research role at a known lab or company - a PhD is common but increasingly not strictly required for industry roles, especially on the applied engineering side. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Thu May 07, 2026 7:11 am
by camila.jackson0
@ethan_fisc Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Sat May 09, 2026 11:55 pm
by servobre20
I dealt with almost this exact situation. Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Mon May 11, 2026 4:39 pm
by sharonschmidt
Small correction on one detail: Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Sun May 17, 2026 7:07 am
by young56
@sharonschmidt This is a great summary, thanks. Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Thu May 28, 2026 5:52 pm
by rtorres
Here's what I know on this: A strong, well-documented personal project (even a modest DIY build or a solid simulation-based RL project) reportedly carries real weight in hiring for this field, partly because the field is young enough that a demonstrated hands-on track record can meaningfully substitute for a less-relevant formal credential.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2026 12:08 am
by ivan22
I can speak to this a bit. Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new.

Re: Anyone working in humanoid robotics outside the well-known companies - how's it different?

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2026 5:48 am
by nschmidt
@ivan22 This lines up with my experience. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile. In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.