Page 2 of 3

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Mon May 04, 2026 12:42 am
by sven.smith4
Can I ask a dumb follow-up - A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Mon May 04, 2026 4:31 am
by jlefebvre
@sven.smith4 +1 to this. Worth adding: 24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Wed May 06, 2026 4:07 am
by nschmidt
@jlefebvre Genuinely curious - Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Sun May 10, 2026 8:28 pm
by nicole57
@nschmidt This matches what I've seen too. A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure. RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 11:04 pm
by garcia51
Appreciate the detailed answer. Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Sat May 23, 2026 5:07 am
by emily.kumar
@garcia51 I'd push back on this a bit. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2026 8:16 am
by george92
@emily.kumar Agreed, and I'd add: A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 6:29 pm
by jonathan_tana
Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in. Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2026 4:56 pm
by garcia51
One nitpick - How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.

Re: How do you evaluate a startup's stability before taking a job there in this space?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2026 11:04 pm
by forgecam45
@garcia51 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.