Page 2 of 6
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:31 pm
by sharonschmidt
This matches what I've seen too.
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2024 5:01 am
by scott21
@sharonschmidt Related question -
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:04 pm
by dubois35
@scott21 I'd push back on this a bit.
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:39 am
by kwilliams
@dubois35 Counterpoint:
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:43 am
by emilyperez
Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 7:34 am
by dubois35
@emilyperez This matches something I went through recently.
A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:58 am
by williams84
@dubois35 Can I ask a dumb follow-up -
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2024 6:19 am
by kwilliams
This lines up with my experience.
A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:00 pm
by servoken70
@kwilliams Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:34 am
by matthew43
@servoken70 Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.