Page 2 of 5

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2025 3:52 pm
by servoken70
This raises a question for me - Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2025 6:42 pm
by matthew43
Genuinely curious - Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:16 am
by ethan_fisc
@matthew43 I can speak to this a bit. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:43 pm
by deborahperez
I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:12 pm
by young56
Just to be precise about one thing: It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 7:42 am
by ashley_flor
Follow-up question though - Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2025 1:32 am
by gimbalmar65
Small correction on one detail: Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2025 12:43 am
by pierregreen
Just to be precise about one thing: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 7:43 pm
by karen.chen3
@pierregreen I see it a little differently. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.

Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2025 3:21 pm
by yuki71
From hands-on experience, Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.