Page 2 of 2
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2025 2:24 pm
by kwilliams
@jhansen This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 12:09 pm
by camila.jackson0
@kwilliams +1 to this. Worth adding:
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:31 am
by park44
Short answer:
Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:57 am
by williams84
From hands-on experience,
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:16 am
by scott.andersson5
@williams84 I see it a little differently.
Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:40 am
by matthew43
Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:32 am
by kwilliams
@matthew43 Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:02 am
by yuki71
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong -
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
Anyway, good thread - following for more.