Page 2 of 3

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 10:08 am
by young56
From hands-on experience, Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:41 am
by lbianchi
@young56 That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:08 am
by pierregreen
@lbianchi Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:11 am
by wei_ross
@pierregreen I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2025 2:49 pm
by lbianchi
@wei_ross This raises a question for me - Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2025 5:15 am
by wei_ross
@lbianchi I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 4:16 pm
by james15
@wei_ross Counterpoint: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:14 am
by camila.jackson0
That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2025 11:47 pm
by young56
@camila.jackson0 Speaking from personal experience here, Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2025 8:38 pm
by larrysokolov
New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious - For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.