Page 2 of 3

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2025 5:54 am
by diego.moore6
To answer this directly: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2025 2:42 am
by emilyperez
@diego.moore6 One nitpick - Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2025 10:56 pm
by cynthia.muller
Pretty much this. One thing to add: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2025 9:44 pm
by ethan17
Pretty much this. One thing to add: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2025 8:25 pm
by gary.tanaka2
This lines up with my experience. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2025 9:22 am
by williams84
Just to be precise about one thing: Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2025 4:16 am
by camila.jackson0
@williams84 This matches something I went through recently. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2025 5:24 am
by jchen
@camila.jackson0 Follow-up question though - Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2025 5:34 pm
by ethan17
@jchen Slightly off-topic, but related: Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.

Re: What's a reasonable joint bandwidth target for dynamic walking?

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2025 8:45 pm
by emilyperez
@ethan17 Ran into exactly this myself. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.