Page 2 of 2
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2026 3:42 pm
by brian.campbell
New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious -
Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2026 3:09 am
by chloe_jack
@brian.campbell Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2026 8:40 pm
by garcia51
@chloe_jack Minor factual note:
Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2026 1:45 am
by camila.jackson0
@garcia51 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2026 6:37 pm
by dchen
@camila.jackson0 Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2026 9:05 pm
by brenda52
Just to be precise about one thing:
Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Re: Are we near diminishing returns on power density for these actuators?
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2026 2:57 am
by barbara_liu
@brenda52 Small correction on one detail:
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.