Page 2 of 2
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 12:43 pm
by nicole57
@park44 I dealt with almost this exact situation.
A lot of the current wave genuinely is repackaged 2000s and 2010s research (ZMP walking, whole-body control, DARPA-era grasping) combined with two things that weren't available then: cheap high-torque-density actuators and large-scale learned policies.
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:38 am
by barbara50
@nicole57 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Elder care is one of the most emotionally appealing use cases and also one of the hardest, because it demands both physical safety around fragile people and social/communication skill that's still far behind the manipulation hype. A lot of the current wave genuinely is repackaged 2000s and 2010s research (ZMP walking, whole-body control, DARPA-era grasping) combined with two things that weren't available then: cheap high-torque-density actuators and large-scale learned policies.
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 2:15 am
by jhansen
@barbara50 I dealt with almost this exact situation.
Wheeled-torso designs solve 90% of warehouse and light-industrial tasks with far less complexity than a biped, which is exactly why so many 'humanoid' demos quietly have wheels under a skirt.
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:50 pm
by sharonschmidt
That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
A lot of the current wave genuinely is repackaged 2000s and 2010s research (ZMP walking, whole-body control, DARPA-era grasping) combined with two things that weren't available then: cheap high-torque-density actuators and large-scale learned policies. The safety case for humanoids working near people usually leans on compliant/backdrivable joints plus soft force limits, but there isn't yet a mature, widely-adopted standard equivalent to what industrial arms have had for decades.
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2025 3:51 am
by chenperez
@sharonschmidt I dealt with almost this exact situation.
The labor-substitution narrative gets simplified a lot in pitch decks; the more honest framing right now is 'augmenting understaffed, high-turnover roles' rather than wholesale replacement. Legs earn their keep specifically where the environment wasn't redesigned for robots - stairs, curbs, uneven yards, cluttered floors - which is a smaller slice of real-world tasks than the marketing suggests.
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 7:41 pm
by jhansen
@chenperez Ran into exactly this myself.
Most flashy demo reels involve some amount of teleoperation, scripted sequencing, or cherry-picked takes - that's not necessarily dishonest, but it does mean the gap between 'demoed' and 'reliably autonomous in production' is still large.
Re: The uncanny valley problem - does it matter for warehouse robots?
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:03 am
by sharonschmidt
@jhansen Ran into exactly this myself.
The labor-substitution narrative gets simplified a lot in pitch decks; the more honest framing right now is 'augmenting understaffed, high-turnover roles' rather than wholesale replacement.