Re: How do you validate a force/torque sensor's calibration in the field?
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2026 8:26 pm
Follow-up question though -
Proprioception (the robot's sense of its own joint angles, velocities, and forces) tends to get less attention than flashy vision systems, even though a lot of balance and manipulation failures trace back to proprioceptive noise or miscalibration rather than a vision problem. Estimating joint torque from motor current draw is cheap and requires no extra sensor, but it's less accurate than a dedicated torque sensor because it doesn't capture friction losses through the gearbox - good enough for coarse control, not always for precise force-controlled tasks.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
Anyway, good thread - following for more.