Page 3 of 4
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2026 6:52 pm
by smartinez
@dubois35 +1 to this. Worth adding:
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2026 9:21 am
by larrysokolov
Sorry if this is a basic question, but
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2026 12:20 pm
by jonathan.rao1
@larrysokolov Side note that might be relevant:
Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 2:21 am
by servoken70
Pretty much this. One thing to add:
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2026 11:40 pm
by jessica_faro
Side note that might be relevant:
Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2026 11:20 am
by hill23
@jessica_faro This matches what I've seen too.
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:55 am
by chloe_jack
Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it:
Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2026 4:49 pm
by george92
@chloe_jack This is a great summary, thanks.
Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2026 7:56 am
by jwang
@george92 Small correction on one detail:
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
Re: Compliant wrists for impact absorption during manipulation mistakes - underrated?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:50 am
by freya.smith
Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.