Page 3 of 3
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2026 1:22 pm
by nicole57
@ssantos From what I've seen:
RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2026 10:48 am
by mohammed.rossi
@nicole57 Can I ask a dumb follow-up -
Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2026 4:33 am
by noah_pate
Appreciate the detailed answer.
Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2026 12:56 pm
by nancy_lewi
@noah_pate I can speak to this a bit.
How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job. A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in.
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 12:17 am
by arjunsanchez
@nancy_lewi Here's what I know on this:
Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new.
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Sun May 17, 2026 9:50 am
by servosan90
@arjunsanchez Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.
Re: What papers should someone new to whole-body control actually read first?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2026 11:21 pm
by karen.chen3
@servosan90 I see it a little differently.
Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field.