Page 3 of 6

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 11:30 pm
by choi98
@emilyperez Can I ask a dumb follow-up - Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 9:25 pm
by mia_lars
Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 8:15 am
by pierregreen
Just to be precise about one thing: It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 10:30 am
by emilyperez
Can I ask a dumb follow-up - Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:37 am
by chloe_jack
Appreciate the detailed answer. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:55 am
by choi98
Side note that might be relevant: A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:47 pm
by olga_lind
This matches what I've seen too. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 4:26 pm
by dubois35
This raises a question for me - Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:10 am
by sarah.santos3
Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent: Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.

Re: How do you budget for actuator replacement costs over a robot's service life?

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2025 8:36 pm
by camila.jackson0
Slightly off-topic, but related: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.