Page 3 of 3
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by amandawhite
@scott.andersson5 Follow-up question though -
Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by young58
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by williams84
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by matthew43
@williams84 Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by novak49
@matthew43 Counterpoint:
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by betty.king
Genuine beginner question -
Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by kwilliams
That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.