Page 3 of 4

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 7:31 am
by barbara50
@ethan17 I'd frame this differently. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:45 pm
by mia.weber
@barbara50 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2025 5:11 pm
by charlesbianchi
This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 2:09 pm
by ramirez77
@charlesbianchi Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2025 9:29 pm
by deborah59
@ramirez77 I can speak to this a bit. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2025 7:56 am
by emilyperez
@deborah59 I can speak to this a bit. A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2025 11:24 am
by benjaminsanchez
From hands-on experience, Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2025 6:23 pm
by emilyperez
@benjaminsanchez I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2025 10:49 pm
by rao91
I can speak to this a bit. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2025 7:29 am
by pierregreen
@rao91 I dealt with almost this exact situation. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.