Page 3 of 5
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Mon May 25, 2026 5:42 pm
by kwilliams
@betty.king Appreciate the detailed answer.
In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Sun May 31, 2026 4:53 am
by ronald.clark
@kwilliams +1 to this. Worth adding:
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2026 9:39 am
by scott.andersson5
Tangent, but worth mentioning:
A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2026 12:02 am
by young56
I dealt with almost this exact situation.
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2026 8:20 pm
by tmartin
Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2026 3:11 am
by ssantos
@tmartin This raises a question for me -
Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked. Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2026 12:27 pm
by amandawhite
I'd frame this differently.
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2026 7:40 am
by yuki71
Agreed, and I'd add:
Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2026 11:05 am
by sarah.santos3
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2026 6:17 pm
by jchen
@sarah.santos3 Minor factual note:
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.