Page 3 of 3
Re: Anyone building open-source BMS firmware others could actually rely on?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2025 12:01 am
by kwilliams
Slightly off-topic, but related:
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs.
Re: Anyone building open-source BMS firmware others could actually rely on?
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2025 12:44 am
by servoken70
@kwilliams I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free. DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too.
Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Re: Anyone building open-source BMS firmware others could actually rely on?
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 5:00 am
by benjaminsanchez
Agreed, and I'd add:
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
Anyway, good thread - following for more.