Page 3 of 3
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2025 3:16 pm
by carlossanchez
@jonathan.rao1 Genuinely curious -
For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:52 pm
by richard36
@carlossanchez This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 8:09 am
by benjaminsanchez
@richard36 I dealt with almost this exact situation.
Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2025 1:26 am
by williams84
I dealt with almost this exact situation.
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2025 12:41 am
by yuki71
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong -
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:56 am
by jessica_faro
@yuki71 From hands-on experience,
Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 2:18 am
by johnrossi
I can speak to this a bit.
Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
Re: Ballscrew vs rotary actuators for linear joints (ankles, etc)
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 8:44 am
by young58
@johnrossi Minor factual note:
For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.