Page 3 of 5
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by lisa.gonzalez8
@charlesbianchi Side note that might be relevant:
Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by vyoung
@lisa.gonzalez8 Genuinely curious -
Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by klewis
@vyoung I see it a little differently.
Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by novikova63
@klewis Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit.
AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by pierregreen
@novikova63 Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by harmonicjen60
Minor factual note:
AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by cynthia.muller
Small correction on one detail:
Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by choi98
That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by klewis
This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by gary.tanaka2
@klewis This matches something I went through recently.
Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.