Page 3 of 3
Re: Anyone tracking how much revenue is genuinely recurring vs one-time pilot fees?
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2025 6:01 am
by sharonschmidt
@wei_ross To answer this directly:
A recurring critique worth taking seriously: a lot of publicly announced 'production capacity' targets (100k units/year, 1 million/year by 2028, etc.) are aspirational manufacturing targets, not confirmed sales or deployment numbers, and the gap between the two has historically been large in hardware industries. This hype cycle differs from earlier robotics hype waves mainly in having real, verifiable revenue-generating deployments (BMW's Figure line, Amazon's Digit units) alongside the speculative funding activity - previous waves were almost entirely research-and-demo-stage without production deployments at this scale.
Re: Anyone tracking how much revenue is genuinely recurring vs one-time pilot fees?
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2025 12:59 am
by byang
@sharonschmidt Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Pilot-to-contract conversion rate is one of the most important and least publicly available numbers in this industry - a company running many flashy pilots isn't the same as a company converting those pilots into multi-year recurring revenue. The 'labor shortage' framing in a lot of humanoid robotics pitch decks is doing real narrative work - it's a genuinely true dynamic in some sectors like warehousing and logistics, but it's also a much more palatable framing than 'labor cost reduction,' and both are usually true simultaneously.
Re: Anyone tracking how much revenue is genuinely recurring vs one-time pilot fees?
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2025 8:05 am
by deborahperez
Here's what I know on this:
Unit economics for an early fleet deployment have to include maintenance, downtime, and technician support costs, not just the sticker price of the robot - a lower unit price (like Unitree's roughly $16k G1) doesn't automatically mean a lower total cost of ownership if support infrastructure is thinner.