Page 3 of 4
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2025 4:43 am
by ivan22
@nicole57 Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2025 11:46 pm
by green28
Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:41 pm
by johnrossi
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 6:21 pm
by ivan22
Minor factual note:
The common academic path into this field is a master's or conversion course in robotics or machine learning, followed by an internship or research role at a known lab or company - a PhD is common but increasingly not strictly required for industry roles, especially on the applied engineering side. 24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2025 8:02 am
by deborah59
@ivan22 This lines up with my experience.
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2025 6:20 am
by mia.weber
Speaking from personal experience here,
Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field. The common academic path into this field is a master's or conversion course in robotics or machine learning, followed by an internship or research role at a known lab or company - a PhD is common but increasingly not strictly required for industry roles, especially on the applied engineering side.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 3:34 am
by scott21
Slightly off-topic, but related:
24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment. Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2025 1:07 pm
by mohammed64
One nitpick -
A strong, well-documented personal project (even a modest DIY build or a solid simulation-based RL project) reportedly carries real weight in hiring for this field, partly because the field is young enough that a demonstrated hands-on track record can meaningfully substitute for a less-relevant formal credential.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 2:41 am
by nicole57
@mohammed64 Side note that might be relevant:
RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
Re: What's the honest career ceiling if you stay purely on the hardware/mechanical side?
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 7:06 pm
by ethan17
@nicole57 From what I've seen:
In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.