Page 3 of 3

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2026 7:20 pm
by rossi30
@joseph31 Agreed, and I'd add: Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 8:38 pm
by mohammed.rossi
@rossi30 This is a great summary, thanks. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Wed May 13, 2026 12:25 am
by george92
Can I ask a dumb follow-up - A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design.

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Fri May 22, 2026 3:38 pm
by rossi30
@george92 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Sun May 24, 2026 6:52 am
by sarah.santos3
@rossi30 Just to be precise about one thing: Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles. In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Mon May 25, 2026 3:39 am
by ivan22
@sarah.santos3 I'd frame this differently. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.

Re: How do you decide between a bigger scope at a smaller company vs a narrower scope at a bigger one?

Posted: Tue May 26, 2026 5:29 am
by mia.weber
Pretty much this. One thing to add: How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.