Page 3 of 3
Re: Actuator weight vs stiffness tradeoff - how do you decide?
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2026 10:10 am
by servosan90
Genuine beginner question -
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
Re: Actuator weight vs stiffness tradeoff - how do you decide?
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2026 10:08 am
by scott.novikova7
@servosan90 Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Re: Actuator weight vs stiffness tradeoff - how do you decide?
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2026 6:27 am
by ssantos
@scott.novikova7 I can speak to this a bit.
Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.