Page 4 of 5
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2026 1:44 pm
by brian.campbell
From hands-on experience,
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2026 9:44 pm
by shill
I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2026 3:58 am
by vyoung
From hands-on experience,
Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2026 1:38 pm
by jwang
One nitpick -
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2026 7:47 pm
by dchen
I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2026 9:42 pm
by emilyperez
Just to be precise about one thing:
In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2026 6:29 am
by scott.novikova7
Just to be precise about one thing:
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2026 1:37 am
by smartinez
@scott.novikova7 This lines up with my experience.
Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2026 9:13 am
by forgesve15
@smartinez Just to be precise about one thing:
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Re: What's the current bottleneck in scaling manipulation training data collection?
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2026 11:24 am
by nicole57
@forgesve15 Agreed, and I'd add:
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.