Page 5 of 6

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2025 2:28 pm
by scott.andersson5
@matthew43 From hands-on experience, Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 10:44 am
by pierregreen
Agreed, and I'd add: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Wed May 07, 2025 5:34 am
by jwang
@pierregreen One nitpick - A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Fri May 16, 2025 5:42 am
by scott21
@jwang This raises a question for me - Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Fri May 23, 2025 8:19 am
by charlesbianchi
This matches something I went through recently. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Sun May 25, 2025 4:20 am
by ramirez77
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Wed May 28, 2025 9:19 am
by zoeanderson
To answer this directly: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:27 am
by charlesbianchi
Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 4:50 am
by sarah.santos3
Speaking from personal experience here, Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2025 9:10 pm
by choi98
@sarah.santos3 To answer this directly: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.