Page 5 of 6
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by benjaminsanchez
@charlesbianchi Pretty much this. One thing to add:
24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by tmartin
@benjaminsanchez Counterpoint:
Remote work remains genuinely limited for most hands-on humanoid hardware roles, given the need for physical access to robots and test environments, though software-only roles (simulation, perception algorithms, offline learning) increasingly do offer remote or hybrid arrangements.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by nancy_lewi
I'd frame this differently.
Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field. Remote work remains genuinely limited for most hands-on humanoid hardware roles, given the need for physical access to robots and test environments, though software-only roles (simulation, perception algorithms, offline learning) increasingly do offer remote or hybrid arrangements.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by freya.sokolov
@nancy_lewi I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by jessica_faro
@freya.sokolov Related question -
RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by pierregreen
@jessica_faro +1 to this. Worth adding:
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles. Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by barbara_liu
@pierregreen Minor factual note:
24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment. RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by aliu
@barbara_liu Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit.
Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by barbara50
This lines up with my experience.
How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by camila.jackson0
@barbara50 This matches what I've seen too.
RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.