Page 1 of 2
Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 1:42 am
by erik_novi
Posting this half as a question, half as a rant.
Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
Anyone want to poke holes in this?
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 3:09 am
by deborahperez
Genuine beginner question -
Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 7:50 am
by dubois35
@deborahperez One nitpick -
Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 8:52 am
by williams84
Minor factual note:
XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:59 am
by chenperez
Not sure I fully agree here.
Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 4:58 pm
by camila.jackson0
@chenperez I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 1:36 pm
by williams84
@camila.jackson0 Agreed, and I'd add:
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases. Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:22 am
by choi98
@williams84 Speaking from personal experience here,
Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2024 9:23 am
by dubois35
I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
Re: Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas vs the old hydraulic version - real comparison
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:30 pm
by emilyperez
@dubois35 Just to be precise about one thing:
Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.