Page 2 of 2
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2025 7:23 pm
by matthew43
@pierregreen This matches something I went through recently.
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2025 10:41 am
by ethan_fisc
@matthew43 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2025 5:25 am
by yuki71
Sorry if this is a basic question, but
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 1:21 pm
by benjaminsanchez
@yuki71 From hands-on experience,
Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2025 9:25 am
by kwilliams
@benjaminsanchez From hands-on experience,
A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2025 1:32 am
by gimbalmar65
This matches something I went through recently.
Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.