What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
-
carol.robinson
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2025 11:36 am
What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Trying to organize my own thinking on this, so bear with me.
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Happy to be told I'm wrong on any of this.
they/them
-
benjaminsanchez
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
I'd push back on this a bit.
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
-
diego.moore6
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2025 8:48 am
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Building > buying.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
From what I've seen:
Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
she/her
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
@scott21 Small correction on one detail:
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
@ethan17 Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit.
Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
Here's what I know on this:
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
@jwang I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
@barbara50 Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
-
pierregreen
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am
Re: What torque density are current commercial actuators actually hitting?
This matches what I've seen too.
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
she/her