Page 3 of 3
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by jonathan_tana
Appreciate the detailed answer.
The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by ramirez77
New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious -
3D-printed gears wearing out is one of the most common early hobbyist failure points - infill percentage, layer orientation relative to load direction, and filament choice (nylon or reinforced composites tend to outlast standard PLA/PETG under repeated gear mesh loading) all matter a lot more than most beginners expect.
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by barbara_liu
Pretty much this. One thing to add:
Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station.
Re: What CAD software are people actually using for their builds?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:59 am
by jchen
@barbara_liu Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.