Page 3 of 3
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 8:16 pm
by servoken70
Side note that might be relevant:
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2026 7:40 pm
by scott21
Small correction on one detail:
Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2026 3:48 am
by choi98
@scott21 This lines up with my experience.
Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2026 7:45 am
by johnrossi
@choi98 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well.
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2026 11:08 pm
by sarah.santos3
@johnrossi Minor factual note:
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2026 2:01 pm
by karen.chen3
I'd push back on this a bit.
Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2026 8:30 pm
by ethan17
Slightly off-topic, but related:
Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2026 4:28 am
by lperez
I see it a little differently.
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Sat May 02, 2026 6:48 pm
by ivan22
+1 to this. Worth adding:
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Re: How do humanoid actuators compare to prosthetic limb actuators in design philosophy?
Posted: Tue May 12, 2026 8:49 am
by benjaminsanchez
@ivan22 That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.