Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?

Battery chemistry, pack design, BMS, runtime, charging/swapping, and keeping actuators from cooking themselves.
kim37
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:21 pm

Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?

Post by kim37 »

I'd frame this differently. Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
nicole10
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:48 am

Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?

Post by nicole10 »

I'd frame this differently. Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free. A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
he/him
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?

Post by matthew43 »

@nicole10 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
amandawhite
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 13, 2026 1:15 pm

Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?

Post by amandawhite »

Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
larrysokolov
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2025 4:23 pm

Re: Anyone tracking actual watt-hours per task (e.g. per box moved) as a real metric?

Post by larrysokolov »

Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Distributed power architectures (multiple smaller packs or local capacitor buffering near high-draw actuators) can reduce peak current demands on the main bus and improve fault isolation, at the cost of added complexity versus a single central pack.
he/him
Post Reply