Serious question: are humanoids actually safer than industrial arms around people?

Open discussion on humanoid robots, the field in general, and anything that doesn't fit the boxes below.
ronald.clark
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2026 9:05 am

Re: Serious question: are humanoids actually safer than industrial arms around people?

Post by ronald.clark »

Genuine beginner question - Open-source humanoid projects matter less for out-competing the well-funded players and more for keeping the barrier to entry low enough that new ideas and new people can actually get into the field. A lot of the current wave genuinely is repackaged 2000s and 2010s research (ZMP walking, whole-body control, DARPA-era grasping) combined with two things that weren't available then: cheap high-torque-density actuators and large-scale learned policies.
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: Serious question: are humanoids actually safer than industrial arms around people?

Post by cynthia.muller »

@ronald.clark This matches what I've seen too. Roughly 7,000-8,000 commercial humanoids are estimated to be operational worldwide as of mid-2026, which sounds like a lot until you compare it to the millions of industrial arms already installed. The uncanny valley matters a lot less in a warehouse than in a living room - nobody cares if a picking robot looks a little stiff, but a home-companion robot with a slightly-off gait reads as unsettling fast.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
Post Reply