How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Open discussion on humanoid robots, the field in general, and anything that doesn't fit the boxes below.
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Post by mia_lars »

@gimbalmar65 Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent: Roughly 7,000-8,000 commercial humanoids are estimated to be operational worldwide as of mid-2026, which sounds like a lot until you compare it to the millions of industrial arms already installed. A genuinely underrated bottleneck is neither hardware nor pure ML - it's the unglamorous integration work of making perception, planning, and control agree with each other reliably for eight-hour shifts.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
nschmidt
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2026 9:26 am

Re: How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Post by nschmidt »

Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Open-source humanoid projects matter less for out-competing the well-funded players and more for keeping the barrier to entry low enough that new ideas and new people can actually get into the field.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
smartinez
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2025 2:55 am

Re: How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Post by smartinez »

@nschmidt This is a great summary, thanks. Wheeled-torso designs solve 90% of warehouse and light-industrial tasks with far less complexity than a biped, which is exactly why so many 'humanoid' demos quietly have wheels under a skirt.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
mohammed.rossi
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:46 pm

Re: How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Post by mohammed.rossi »

@smartinez This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Elder care is one of the most emotionally appealing use cases and also one of the hardest, because it demands both physical safety around fragile people and social/communication skill that's still far behind the manipulation hype. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
shill
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:09 pm

Re: How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Post by shill »

@mohammed.rossi Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. The uncanny valley matters a lot less in a warehouse than in a living room - nobody cares if a picking robot looks a little stiff, but a home-companion robot with a slightly-off gait reads as unsettling fast. Open-source humanoid projects matter less for out-competing the well-funded players and more for keeping the barrier to entry low enough that new ideas and new people can actually get into the field.
carol38
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:48 am

Re: How much of the current wave is genuinely new vs. repackaged 2000s research?

Post by carol38 »

@shill Follow-up question though - Wheeled-torso designs solve 90% of warehouse and light-industrial tasks with far less complexity than a biped, which is exactly why so many 'humanoid' demos quietly have wheels under a skirt.
Post Reply