What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
-
servoken70
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
This raises a question for me -
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
Genuinely curious -
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
-
ethan_fisc
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
@matthew43 I can speak to this a bit.
Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
-
deborahperez
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
Just to be precise about one thing:
It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
-
ashley_flor
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2025 8:12 pm
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
Follow-up question though -
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
-
gimbalmar65
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
Small correction on one detail:
Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
-
pierregreen
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
Just to be precise about one thing:
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her
-
karen.chen3
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
@pierregreen I see it a little differently.
A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
they/them
Re: What's the real lifespan difference between a QDD joint and a harmonic drive joint?
From hands-on experience,
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days