Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by charlesbianchi »

One nitpick - Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her
niklas29
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2026 9:55 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by niklas29 »

I'd frame this differently. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
niklassantos
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon May 04, 2026 3:24 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by niklassantos »

+1 to this. Worth adding: Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
tmartin
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon May 25, 2026 8:56 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by tmartin »

Appreciate the detailed answer. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
he/him
jchen
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2025 2:19 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by jchen »

@tmartin Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
karen.chen3
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by karen.chen3 »

Minor factual note: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. Anyway, good thread - following for more.
they/them
Post Reply