Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
deborahperez
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by deborahperez »

Genuine beginner question - Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by williams84 »

@deborahperez Tangent, but worth mentioning: Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
mia.weber
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:38 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by mia.weber »

This is a great summary, thanks. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by cynthia.muller »

Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by yuki71 »

New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious - Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by williams84 »

@yuki71 I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
erik_novi
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2024 6:23 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by erik_novi »

@williams84 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
she/her
sharonschmidt
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:31 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by sharonschmidt »

@erik_novi To answer this directly: Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by park44 »

@sharonschmidt Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
she/her
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: Which Chinese humanoid makers should people outside China actually be watching?

Post by nicole57 »

@park44 I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
Post Reply