What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
barbara50
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2024 12:19 pm

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by barbara50 »

@ethan17 I'd frame this differently. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
mia.weber
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:38 am

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by mia.weber »

@barbara50 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by charlesbianchi »

This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
she/her
ramirez77
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2025 9:39 pm

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by ramirez77 »

@charlesbianchi Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
deborah59
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:37 am

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by deborah59 »

@ramirez77 I can speak to this a bit. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by emilyperez »

@deborah59 I can speak to this a bit. A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

From hands-on experience, Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by emilyperez »

@benjaminsanchez I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
rao91
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2025 1:55 am

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by rao91 »

I can speak to this a bit. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
he/him
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: What's underrated: grasp force control precision or grasp planning speed?

Post by pierregreen »

@rao91 I dealt with almost this exact situation. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
she/her
Post Reply