How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
This lines up with my experience.
Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
-
robertmiller
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2026 4:05 pm
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
@emma_whit I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs. A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
@robertmiller This lines up with my experience.
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
-
gary.tanaka2
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 2:35 pm
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
Tangent, but worth mentioning:
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs.
-
benjaminsanchez
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
@gary.tanaka2 I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
-
rebecca_lefe
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2025 6:36 am
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
@benjaminsanchez This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Distributed power architectures (multiple smaller packs or local capacitor buffering near high-draw actuators) can reduce peak current demands on the main bus and improve fault isolation, at the cost of added complexity versus a single central pack. DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too.
she/her
-
betty.king
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:37 am
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
Sorry if this is a basic question, but
DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
@betty.king This raises a question for me -
Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs. Distributed power architectures (multiple smaller packs or local capacitor buffering near high-draw actuators) can reduce peak current demands on the main bus and improve fault isolation, at the cost of added complexity versus a single central pack.
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
@hill23 One nitpick -
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
they/them
-
mohammed.rossi
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:46 pm
Re: How much heat does the power electronics itself add versus the actuators?
Slightly off-topic, but related:
Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting. Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs.