Anyone building their own cell-level monitoring instead of trusting a BMS chip?
Re: Anyone building their own cell-level monitoring instead of trusting a BMS chip?
This raises a question for me -
Distributed power architectures (multiple smaller packs or local capacitor buffering near high-draw actuators) can reduce peak current demands on the main bus and improve fault isolation, at the cost of added complexity versus a single central pack.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: Anyone building their own cell-level monitoring instead of trusting a BMS chip?
@byang Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
The average humanoid in 2026 carries under 2.5 kWh of battery capacity, with real-world runtimes clustering between two and four hours depending on how dynamic the workload is - static, low-motion tasks stretch runtime much further than continuous walking or lifting.
-
edward.nelson
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2026 2:23 pm
Re: Anyone building their own cell-level monitoring instead of trusting a BMS chip?
I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
The average humanoid in 2026 carries under 2.5 kWh of battery capacity, with real-world runtimes clustering between two and four hours depending on how dynamic the workload is - static, low-motion tasks stretch runtime much further than continuous walking or lifting.
she/her