Coreless vs iron-core motors for lightweight joints

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Coreless vs iron-core motors for lightweight joints

Post by servoken70 »

@ananya.novak That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
rivera14
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2026 1:48 am

Re: Coreless vs iron-core motors for lightweight joints

Post by rivera14 »

Follow-up question though - Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: Coreless vs iron-core motors for lightweight joints

Post by mia_lars »

This is a great summary, thanks. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
servobre20
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2026 6:16 am

Re: Coreless vs iron-core motors for lightweight joints

Post by servobre20 »

Appreciate the detailed answer. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
amandawhite
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 13, 2026 1:15 pm

Re: Coreless vs iron-core motors for lightweight joints

Post by amandawhite »

@servobre20 Just to be precise about one thing: A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Post Reply