How much does object mass estimation error actually hurt grasp stability?
-
ethan_fisc
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am
Re: How much does object mass estimation error actually hurt grasp stability?
@cynthia.muller I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
Re: How much does object mass estimation error actually hurt grasp stability?
@ethan_fisc Small correction on one detail:
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Re: How much does object mass estimation error actually hurt grasp stability?
Ran into exactly this myself.
Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
barbara.jones
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:12 pm
Re: How much does object mass estimation error actually hurt grasp stability?
@ethan17 Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it:
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: How much does object mass estimation error actually hurt grasp stability?
Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Anyway, good thread - following for more.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.