How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
diego.moore6
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu May 08, 2025 8:48 am

Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Post by diego.moore6 »

@ivan22 Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent: Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Building > buying.
deborahperez
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am

Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Post by deborahperez »

I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
carlossanchez
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am

Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Post by carlossanchez »

@deborahperez This raises a question for me - XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
emily.kumar
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:42 pm

Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Post by emily.kumar »

+1 to this. Worth adding: Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
george92
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2025 4:18 pm

Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Post by george92 »

@emily.kumar That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: How seriously should we take PAL Robotics given their much longer track record?

Post by yuki71 »

@george92 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply