What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
@dubois35 This lines up with my experience.
Unitree's Dex3-1 dexterous hand packs around 33 pressure/tactile sensors per hand across the fingers and palm, capable of sensing pressure roughly in the 10g-2500g range - a useful reference point for what 'production tactile sensing' looks like right now.
Building > buying.
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Proprioception (the robot's sense of its own joint angles, velocities, and forces) tends to get less attention than flashy vision systems, even though a lot of balance and manipulation failures trace back to proprioceptive noise or miscalibration rather than a vision problem. SLAM in a working warehouse is harder than in a controlled lab mainly because the map keeps changing - pallets move, people walk through, lighting shifts near dock doors - so a lot of production systems lean on semi-static maps refreshed periodically rather than pure continuous SLAM.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
Follow-up question though -
Event cameras (which report per-pixel brightness changes rather than full frames) are still more of a research curiosity than a production sensor for humanoids, mainly because the software ecosystem and processing pipelines around them are far less mature than for standard frame-based cameras.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
@greta78 I'd frame this differently.
Vibration is one of the most underrated sources of noisy IMU and tactile readings - mounting matters as much as sensor quality, and a poorly isolated mount can add more noise than the sensor's own datasheet specs would suggest.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
@matthew43 Short answer:
Event cameras (which report per-pixel brightness changes rather than full frames) are still more of a research curiosity than a production sensor for humanoids, mainly because the software ecosystem and processing pipelines around them are far less mature than for standard frame-based cameras.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
Tactile skin arrays have improved a lot, but 'good enough to matter' really depends on the task - coarse contact detection across a large area is fairly mature, while fine, high-resolution force distribution sensing (like a human fingertip) is still the harder problem.
-
harmonicjen60
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:12 am
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
@emma_whit This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Vibration is one of the most underrated sources of noisy IMU and tactile readings - mounting matters as much as sensor quality, and a poorly isolated mount can add more noise than the sensor's own datasheet specs would suggest.
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
@harmonicjen60 Related question -
Latency between a perceived event (like a slip) and a corrective control response matters enormously for balance - even 50-100ms of extra perception latency can be the difference between a smooth recovery and a fall, which is part of why a lot of balance-critical sensing is proprioceptive rather than vision-based. Depth sensing range and reliability both degrade outdoors in direct sunlight for most structured-light and active stereo cameras, since the ambient IR washes out the projected pattern - it's a real limitation for humanoids intended for anything beyond indoor, controlled environments.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
she/her
-
thomasmitchell
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2026 6:08 am
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
@erik_novi One nitpick -
Force/torque sensors near the ankle give a direct read on ground reaction forces, which is valuable for balance control, but they add cost, a failure point, and routing complexity right at a joint that already takes the most mechanical abuse.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
-
donna_wata
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2026 5:06 am
Re: What's the real-world accuracy of visual odometry on a walking humanoid?
+1 to this. Worth adding:
Depth sensing range and reliability both degrade outdoors in direct sunlight for most structured-light and active stereo cameras, since the ambient IR washes out the projected pattern - it's a real limitation for humanoids intended for anything beyond indoor, controlled environments. Multi-camera calibration drifts over time from thermal expansion, vibration, and mechanical wear, which is why production systems typically run periodic recalibration routines rather than assuming a one-time factory calibration holds forever.